Search : U.S. Supreme Court : Corporation & Enterprise Law : From 10/01/05 To 07/01/06
Number of summaries found: 4
Search For More Summaries
| Court: | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Topic: | Constitutional Law, Corporation & Enterprise Law, Elections, Government Law |
| Title: | Randall v. Sorrell |
| Date: | 06/26/06 |
| Case Number: | 04–1528, 04–1530, 04–1697 |
| Summary: | A decision by a court of appeals holding that a Vermont campaign finance statute's contribution limits were constitutional and that its expenditure limits may be constitutional is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings. |
| Court: | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Topic: | Civil Procedure, Commercial Law, Corporation & Enterprise Law, Evidence, Government Law, Tax Law |
| Title: | Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp. |
| Date: | 06/05/06 |
| Case Number: | 04–433 |
| Summary: | A judgment reversing dismissal of respondent's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) claims against a competing company is reversed in part where a 18 U.S.C. section 1962(c) claim did not satisfy the requirement of proximate causation with regards to a claim that respondent lost sales due to petitioners' decreased prices, which allegedly resulted from their tax fraud. |
| Court: | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Topic: | Commercial Law, Corporation & Enterprise Law, Per Curiam |
| Title: | Mohawk Indus. v. Williams |
| Date: | 06/05/06 |
| Case Number: | 05–465 |
| Summary: | A writ of certiorari limited to Question 1 presented by the petition is dismissed as improvidently granted, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, and the judgment vacated for further consideration in light of Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp., 547 U.S. ____ (2006). |
| Court: | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Topic: | Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Corporation & Enterprise Law, Securities Law |
| Title: | Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit |
| Date: | 03/21/06 |
| Case Number: | 04–1371 |
| Summary: | A judgment vacating dismissal of a private securities fraud class action is reversed where the background, text, and purpose of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act's (SLUSA) pre-emption provision demonstrated that SLUSA pre-empts state-law holder class-action claims of the kind plaintiff alleged. |