• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/358/644.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    UNITED STATES v. HALEY, 358 U.S. 644 (1959)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    UNITED STATES v. HALEY, 358 U.S. 644 (1959)

    358 U.S. 644

    UNITED STATES v. HALEY.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
    OF TEXAS. No. 587.
    Decided February 24, 1959.

    166 F. Supp. 336, reversed.

    Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston, R. L. Farrington, Neil Brooks and Donald A. Campbell for the United States.

    William F. Billings, James P. Donovan and Daniel L. O'Connor for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The judgment is reversed. Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 .


    LANDMAN v. MIEDZINSKI, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=358&invol=644">358 U.S. 644 </a> (1959) 358 U.S. 644 (1959) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    LANDMAN v. MIEDZINSKI, 358 U.S. 644 (1959)

    358 U.S. 644

    LANDMAN ET AL. v. MIEDZINSKI, SHERIFF, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
    No. 589.
    Decided February 24, 1959.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 218 Md. 3, 145 A. 2d 220.

    F. Joseph Donohue and Harold C. Faulkner for appellants.

    C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, Stedman Prescott, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and James H. Norris, Jr. for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [358 U.S. 644, 645]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw