• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/dc/963083.html
    USA v LEVI BERNARD S.
    United States Court of Appeals

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

    Filed May 6, 1997

    No. 96-3083

    United States of America,

    Appellee

    v.

    Bernard S. Levi,

    Appellant

    Appeal from the United States District Court

    for the District of Columbia

    (No. 92cr0010-01)

    ____-

    No. 96-5200

    Adrian Williams-El,

    Appellant

    v.

    United States of America,

    Appellee

    ____-


    Appeal from the United States District Court

    for the District of Columbia

    (No. 96cv01396)

    Bernard S. Levi, pro se, No. 96-3083.

    Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney, John R.

    Fisher, and Elizabeth Trosman, Assistant United States At-

    torneys.

    Adrian Williams-El, pro se, No. 96-5200.

    Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney, and John R.

    Fisher, Assistant United States Attorney.

    Before: Wald, Williams, and Tatel, Circuit Judges

    Opinion for the Court filed Per Curiam .

    No. 96-3083 presents the threshold question whether the

    filing-fee provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of

    1995 ("PLRA") apply to proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

    No. 96-5200 presents the same question with respect to 28

    U.S.C. § 2254. We publish this opinion in order to express

    agreement with our sister circuits, which have uniformly held

    the PLRA inapplicable to such proceedings. See Smith v.

    Angelone, No. 96-7, 1997 WL 198075, at *2-4 (4th Cir. Apr.

    24, 1997); Anderson v. Singletary, No. 96-2697, 1997 WL

    188417 (11th Cir. Apr. 18, 1997); United States v. Simmonds,

    No. 96-3287, 1997 WL 177560, at *4-6 (10th Cir. Apr. 14,

    1997); Naddi v. Hill, 106 F.3d 275, 277 (9th Cir. 1997);

    United States v. Cole, 101 F.3d 1076, 1077 (5th Cir. 1996);

    Santana v. United States, 98 F.3d 752, 755-56 (3d Cir. 1996);

    Martin v. United States, 96 F.3d 853, 855-56 (7th Cir. 1996);

    Reyes v. Keane, 90 F.3d 676, 678 (2d Cir. 1996).

    We need not publish the disposition of the merits of

    appellants' appeals, which will issue in separate orders.

    Per Curiam

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw