• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/396/113.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    PERK v. OHIO, 396 U.S. 113 (1969)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    PERK v. OHIO, 396 U.S. 113 (1969)

    396 U.S. 113

    PERK, AUDITOR OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY v. OHIO EX REL. CORRIGAN, PROSECUTING
    ATTORNEY OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO No. 590.
    Decided December 8, 1969

    19 Ohio St. 2d 1, 249 N. E. 2d 525, appeal dismissed.

    Gerald A. Donahue and Donald M. Robiner for appellant.

    John T. Corrigan, pro se, and John L. Dowling for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


    MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT v. CAPITAL ELEC. POW. ASSN., <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=396&invol=113">396 U.S. 113 </a> (1969) 396 U.S. 113 (1969) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT v. CAPITAL ELEC. POW. ASSN., 396 U.S. 113 (1969)

    396 U.S. 113

    MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO. v. CAPITAL ELECTRIC POWER ASSN.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
    No. 611.
    Decided December 8, 1969

    222 So.2d 399, appeal dismissed.

    Bernard G. Segal, Samuel D. Slade, Sherwood W. Wise, Garner W. Green, and Joshua Green for appellant.

    T. Harvey Hedgepeth for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [396 U.S. 113, 114]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw