• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/394/845.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 845 (1969)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 845 (1969)

    394 U.S. 845

    SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
    No. 1050.
    Decided May 5, 1969.

    Appeal dismissed.

    Robert L. Pierce for appellant.

    Mary Moran Pajalich for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


    SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=394&invol=845">394 U.S. 845 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 845 (1969) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 845 (1969)

    394 U.S. 845

    SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
    NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1152.
    Decided May 5, 1969.

    Affirmed.

    Robert L. Pierce for appellant.

    Mary Moran Pajalich for appellee Public Utilities Commission of California.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

    MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [394 U.S. 845, 846]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw