• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/394/214.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    SHAW v. ILLINOIS, 394 U.S. 214 (1969)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SHAW v. ILLINOIS, 394 U.S. 214 (1969)

    394 U.S. 214

    SHAW v. ILLINOIS.
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE
    COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT. No. 665, Misc.
    Decided March 10, 1969.

    Certiorari granted; 89 Ill. App. 2d 285, 233 N. E. 2d 73, vacated and remanded.

    Gerald W. Getty and Marshall J. Hartman for petitioner.

    William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, for further consideration in light of Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129 .

    MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.


    WATTS v. MARYLAND, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=394&invol=214">394 U.S. 214 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 214 (1969) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    WATTS v. MARYLAND, 394 U.S. 214 (1969)

    394 U.S. 214

    WATTS v. MARYLAND.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
    No. 1267, Misc.
    Decided March 10, 1969.

    Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [394 U.S. 214, 215]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw