• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/393/77.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    LAKE v. POTOMAC LIGHT & POWER CO., 393 U.S. 77 (1968)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    LAKE v. POTOMAC LIGHT & POWER CO., 393 U.S. 77 (1968)

    393 U.S. 77

    LAKE ET VIR v. POTOMAC LIGHT & POWER CO.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA.
    No. 364.
    Decided October 21, 1968.

    Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


    DYMYTRYSHYN v. ESPERDY, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=393&invol=77">393 U.S. 77 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 77 (1968) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    DYMYTRYSHYN v. ESPERDY, 393 U.S. 77 (1968)

    393 U.S. 77

    DYMYTRYSHYN ET AL. v.
    ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 380.
    Decided October 21, 1968.

    285 F. Supp. 507, affirmed.

    John J. Abt for appellants.

    Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Philip R. Monahan for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [393 U.S. 77, 78]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw