• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/393/220.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    SHAW v. GARRISON, 393 U.S. 220 (1968)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SHAW v. GARRISON, 393 U.S. 220 (1968)

    393 U.S. 220

    SHAW v. GARRISON ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 579.
    Decided December 9, 1968.

    Affirmed.

    Herve Racivitch for appellant.

    Eberhard P. Deutsch and Rene H. Himel, Jr., for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

    THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


    LANDRY v. BOYLE, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=393&invol=220">393 U.S. 220 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 220 (1968) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    LANDRY v. BOYLE, 393 U.S. 220 (1968)

    393 U.S. 220

    LANDRY ET AL. v. BOYLE, CHIEF JUDGE, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 659.
    Decided December 9, 1968.

    280 F. Supp. 938, appeal dismissed.

    Robert L. Tucker, R. Eugene Pincham, Jean F. Williams, Leonard Karlin, William M. Kunstler, and Arthur Kinoy for appellants.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 13 (1). [393 U.S. 220, 221]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw