• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/389/570.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 570 (1968)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 570 (1968)

    389 U.S. 570

    RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT
    OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 879.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

    274 F. Supp. 200, affirmed.

    Clyde C. Randolph, Jr., pro se, and Jerry Dee Moize for appellant.

    Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander and Jack H. Weiner for the United States.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


    DINIS v. VOLPE, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=389&invol=570">389 U.S. 570 </a> (1968) 389 U.S. 570 (1968) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    DINIS v. VOLPE, 389 U.S. 570 (1968)

    389 U.S. 570

    DINIS ET AL. v. VOLPE, GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
    MASSACHUSETTS. No. 882.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

    264 F. Supp. 425, affirmed.

    Edmund Dinis, pro se, for other appellants.

    Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, and Mark L. Cohen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [389 U.S. 570, 571]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw