• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/385/371.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    EXLEY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 371 (1966)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    EXLEY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 371 (1966)

    385 U.S. 371

    EXLEY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
    No. 644.
    Decided December 12, 1966.

    Affirmed.

    Robert L. Holtzclaw and James T. Johnson for appellant.

    Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.; Earle V. White for Albany Food Products, Inc., appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


    LAIRD & CO. v. CHENEY, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=385&invol=371">385 U.S. 371 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 371 (1966) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    LAIRD & CO. v. CHENEY, 385 U.S. 371 (1966)

    385 U.S. 371

    LAIRD & CO. ET AL. v. CHENEY, DIRECTOR OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL,
    ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS. No. 675.
    Decided December 12, 1966.

    196 Kan. 675, 414 P.2d 18, appeal dismissed.

    Harry W. Colmery and Robert E. Russell for appellants.

    Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and Park McGee, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 371, 372]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw