• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/384/434.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    LAMBRIGHT v. CALIFORNIA, 384 U.S. 434 (1966)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    LAMBRIGHT v. CALIFORNIA, 384 U.S. 434 (1966)

    384 U.S. 434

    LAMBRIGHT v. CALIFORNIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
    DISTRICT. No. 1408, Misc.
    Decided June 6, 1966.

    Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [384 U.S. 434, 435]  


    DOUBLE EAGLE LUBRICANTS v. TEXAS, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=384&invol=434">384 U.S. 434 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 434 (1966) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    DOUBLE EAGLE LUBRICANTS v. TEXAS, 384 U.S. 434 (1966)

    384 U.S. 434

    DOUBLE EAGLE LUBRICANTS, INC. v. TEXAS.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
    TEXAS. No. 1177.
    Decided June 6, 1966.

    248 F. Supp. 515, appeal dismissed.

    John B. Ogden for appellant.

    Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. Fender, Lonny F. Zwiener and Robert W. Norris, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Swift & Co., Inc. v. Wickham, 382 U.S. 111 , and Pennsylvania Public Utility Comm'n v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 382 U.S. 281 .

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw