• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/384/100.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    FORD v. CALIFORNIA, 384 U.S. 100 (1966)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    FORD v. CALIFORNIA, 384 U.S. 100 (1966)

    384 U.S. 100

    FORD, AKA PHELAN v. CALIFORNIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
    DISTRICT. No. 1089.
    Decided April 25, 1966.

    236 Cal. App. 2d 438, 46 Cal. Rptr. 144, appeal dismissed.

    Richard G. Harris for appellant.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


    KRAMER v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=384&invol=100">384 U.S. 100 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 100 (1966) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    KRAMER v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 100 (1966)

    384 U.S. 100

    KRAMER ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
    THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1114.
    Decided April 25, 1966.

    Certiorari granted; 355 F.2d 891, partially vacated and remanded.

    Anna R. Lavin and Frank J. McGarr for petitioners.

    Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

    PER CURIAM.

    Upon consideration of the representations of the Solicitor General and upon an independent examination of the entire record, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order suspending the imposition of sentence for the conviction on count two of the indictment as to Roy E. Kramer is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for entry of an appropriate sentence. In all other respects the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. [384 U.S. 100, 101]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw