• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/383/102.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    McMORRIS v. CALIFORNIA, 383 U.S. 102 (1966)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    McMORRIS v. CALIFORNIA, 383 U.S. 102 (1966)

    383 U.S. 102

    McMORRIS v. CALIFORNIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
    COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. No. 1036, Misc.
    Decided February 21, 1966.

    Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [383 U.S. 102, 103]  


    LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=383&invol=102">383 U.S. 102 </a> (1966) 383 U.S. 102 (1966) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 102 (1966)

    383 U.S. 102

    LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
    KENTUCKY. No. 792.
    Decided February 21, 1966.

    244 F. Supp. 337, affirmed.

    H. G. Breetz, W. L. Grubbs, M. D. Jones and Joseph L. Lenihan for appellant.

    Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. Edward J. Hickey, Jr., James L. Highsaw, Jr., and Robert E. Hogan for appellee Railway Labor Executives' Association.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw