• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/382/160.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    HODGES v. BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP., 382 U.S. 160 (1965)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    HODGES v. BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP., 382 U.S. 160 (1965)

    382 U.S. 160

    HODGES ET AL. v. BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP.
    APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT.
    No. 548.
    Decided November 22, 1965.

    174 So.2d 565, appeal dismissed.

    George C. Dayton and Joe A. McClain for appellants.

    Richard W. Barrett and J. Lewis Hall for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. [382 U.S. 160, 161]  


    REYNOLDS METALS CO. v. WASHINGTON, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=382&invol=160">382 U.S. 160 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 160 (1965) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    REYNOLDS METALS CO. v. WASHINGTON, 382 U.S. 160 (1965)

    382 U.S. 160

    REYNOLDS METALS CO. v. WASHINGTON ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
    No. 537.
    Decided November 22, 1965.

    65 Wash. 2d 882, 400 P.2d 310, appeal dismissed.

    DeWitt Williams for appellant.

    John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and James A. Furber and Henry W. Wager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

    MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw