• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/379/8.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    BENNETT v. COUNTY OF DADE, 379 U.S. 8 (1964)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    BENNETT v. COUNTY OF DADE, 379 U.S. 8 (1964)

    379 U.S. 8

    BENNETT v. COUNTY OF DADE, FLORIDA.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
    No. 275, Misc.
    Decided October 12, 1964.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [379 U.S. 8, 9]  


    YORTY v. JORDAN, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=379&invol=8">379 U.S. 8 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 8 (1964) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    YORTY v. JORDAN, 379 U.S. 8 (1964)

    379 U.S. 8

    YORTY ET AL. v. JORDAN, SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
    No. 250.
    Decided October 12, 1964.

    Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    Roger Arnebergh, Bourke Jones and James A. Doherty for appellants.

    Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Charles E. Corker and Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorneys General, and Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw