• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/379/2.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    CITY OF PLANTATION v. UTILITIES OPERATING CO., INC., 379 U.S. 2 (1964)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    CITY OF PLANTATION v. UTILITIES OPERATING CO., INC., 379 U.S. 2 (1964)

    379 U.S. 2

    CITY OF PLANTATION v. UTILITIES OPERATING CO., INC.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
    No. 72.
    Decided October 12, 1964.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 156 So.2d 842.

    Carl A. Hiaasen for appellant.

    William E. Miller and Robert J. Corber for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [379 U.S. 2, 3]  


    DAVIS v. NEELY, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=379&invol=2">379 U.S. 2 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 2 (1964) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    DAVIS v. NEELY, 379 U.S. 2 (1964)

    379 U.S. 2

    DAVIS v. NEELY ET UX.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.
    No. 68.
    Decided October 12, 1964.

    Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    Reported below: 387 P.2d 494.

    John W. Willis for appellant.

    Thomas D. Finney, Jr., and Grant W. Wiprud for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw