• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/378/562.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    TOWN OF FRANKLIN v. BUTTERWORTH, 378 U.S. 562 (1964)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    TOWN OF FRANKLIN v. BUTTERWORTH, 378 U.S. 562 (1964)

    378 U.S. 562

    TOWN OF FRANKLIN ET AL. v. BUTTERWORTH ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
    CONNECTICUT. No. 1032.
    Decided June 22, 1964.

    229 F. Supp. 754, affirmed.

    John D. Fassett for appellants.

    Richard H. Bowerman for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


    SENK v. PENNSYLVANIA, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=378&invol=562">378 U.S. 562 </a> (1964) 378 U.S. 562 (1964) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SENK v. PENNSYLVANIA, 378 U.S. 562 (1964)

    378 U.S. 562

    SENK v. PENNSYLVANIA.
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
    No. 900, Misc.
    Decided June 22, 1964.

    Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

    Reported below: 412 Pa. 184, 194 A. 2d 221.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

    MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra. [378 U.S. 562, 563]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw