• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/377/124.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    VOKES v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 377 U.S. 124 (1964)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    VOKES v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 377 U.S. 124 (1964)

    377 U.S. 124

    VOKES ET AL. v. CITY OF CHICAGO.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
    No. 855.
    Decided April 20, 1964.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 28 Ill. 2d 475, 193 N. E. 2d 40.

    Charles A. Bellows for appellants.

    John C. Melaniphy, Sydney R. Drebin and Robert J. Collins for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [377 U.S. 124, 125]  


    378 REALTY CORP. v. NEW YORK RENT & REHAB. ADMIN., <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=377&invol=124">377 U.S. 124 </a> (1964) 377 U.S. 124 (1964) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    378 REALTY CORP. v. NEW YORK RENT & REHAB. ADMIN., 377 U.S. 124 (1964)

    377 U.S. 124

    378 REALTY CORP. ET AL. v. NEW YORK CITY RENT AND REHABILITATION
    ADMINISTRATION ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 845.
    Decided April 20, 1964.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 13 N. Y. 2d 902, 193 N. E. 2d 510.

    Harris L. Present and Irving S. Freedman for appellants.

    Beatrice Shainswit for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw