• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/375/57.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    SOUTH COAST FISHERIES v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, 375 U.S. 57 (1963)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SOUTH COAST FISHERIES v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, 375 U.S. 57 (1963)

    375 U.S. 57

    SOUTH COAST FISHERIES, INC., ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME.
    APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
    DISTRICT. No. 372.
    Decided October 28, 1963.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 213 Cal. App. 2d 325, 28 Cal. Rptr. 537.

    John J. Real for appellants.

    Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Neal J. Gobar, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


    ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO. v. GULF COAST RICE MILLS, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=375&invol=57">375 U.S. 57 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 57 (1963) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO. v. GULF COAST RICE MILLS, 375 U.S. 57 (1963)

    375 U.S. 57

    ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO., INC., v. GULF COAST RICE MILLS.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIRST SUPREME JUDICIAL
    DISTRICT. No. 424.
    Decided October 28, 1963.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 362 S. W. 2d 159.

    John D. Richardson for appellant.

    Lamar Carnes for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [375 U.S. 57, 58]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw