• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/374/95.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA, 374 U.S. 95 (1963)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA, 374 U.S. 95 (1963)

    374 U.S. 95

    SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
    No. 1003, Misc.
    Decided June 10, 1963.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Appellant pro se.

    Walter E. Alessandroni, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and George G. Lindsay, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [374 U.S. 95, 96]  


    SLOAN'S MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=374&invol=95">374 U.S. 95 </a> (1963) 374 U.S. 95 (1963) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SLOAN'S MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES, 374 U.S. 95 (1963)

    374 U.S. 95

    SLOAN'S MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
    MISSOURI. No. 880.
    Decided June 10, 1963.

    208 F. Supp. 567, affirmed.

    Herbert Burstein for appellant.

    Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and Bernard G. Segal, Richmond C. Coburn, S. Harrison Kahn, Irving R. Segal and Robert L. Kendall, Jr. for United Parcel Service, Inc., appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw