• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/374/490.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    BRADLEY v. IOWA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    BRADLEY v. IOWA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963)

    374 U.S. 490

    BRADLEY v. IOWA.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
    No. 934, Misc.
    Decided June 17, 1963.

    Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    Reported below: 254 Iowa 211, 116 N. W. 2d 439.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [374 U.S. 490, 491]  


    MAYS v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=374&invol=490">374 U.S. 490 </a> (1963) 374 U.S. 490 (1963) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    MAYS v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963)

    374 U.S. 490

    MAYS v. CALIFORNIA.
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
    No. 871, Misc.
    Decided June 17, 1963.

    Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

    Reported below: See 205 Cal. App. 2d 798, 23 Cal. Rptr. 605.

    Petitioner pro se.

    Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

    MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358 , 360.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw