• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/371/35.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    KAVANAGH v. BROWN, 371 U.S. 35 (1962)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    KAVANAGH v. BROWN, 371 U.S. 35 (1962)

    371 U.S. 35

    KAVANAGH ET AL. v. BROWN, TREASURER OF MICHIGAN, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
    DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 299.
    Decided October 22, 1962.

    206 F. Supp. 479, affirmed.

    Thomas M. Kavanagh and Eugene F. Black, appellants, pro se.

    Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Eugene Krasicky, Solicitor General, and Stanton S. Faville, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


    CITY OF AKRON v. OHIO, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=371&invol=35">371 U.S. 35 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 35 (1962) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    CITY OF AKRON v. OHIO, 371 U.S. 35 (1962)

    371 U.S. 35

    CITY OF AKRON ET AL. v. OHIO EX REL. McELROY, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
    No. 327.
    Decided October 22, 1962.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 189, 181 N.E. 2d 26.

    James V. Barbuto and Sal Germano for appellants.

    Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Theodore R. Saker and Jay C. Flowers, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [371 U.S. 35, 36]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw