• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/371/21.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    UNITED STATES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS, 371 U.S. 21 (1962)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    UNITED STATES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS, 371 U.S. 21 (1962)

    371 U.S. 21

    UNITED STATES ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
    NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 235.
    Decided October 15, 1962.

    202 F. Supp. 757, affirmed.

    Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, I. Henry Kutz and William Massar for the United States.

    John H. Caruthers for Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., appellant.

    PER CURIAM.

    The judgment is affirmed.


    SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., v. HURD, ADMINISTRATOR, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=371&invol=21">371 U.S. 21 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 21 (1962) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., v. HURD, ADMINISTRATOR, 371 U.S. 21 (1962)

    371 U.S. 21

    SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SOUTHEAST AIRLINES,
    v. HURD. ADMINISTRATOR.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE, EASTERN DIVISION. No. 286.
    Decided October 15, 1962.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 209 Tenn. 639, 355 S. W. 2d 436.

    Russell R. Kramer and Erma Griffith Greenwood for appellant.

    Howard E. Wilson and Preston H. Taylor for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [371 U.S. 21, 22]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw