• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/365/567.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    JERROLD ELECTRONICS CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 567 (1961)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    JERROLD ELECTRONICS CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 567 (1961)

    365 U.S. 567

    JERROLD ELECTRONICS CORP. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
    PENNSYLVANIA. No. 631.
    Decided March 20, 1961.

    187 F. Supp. 545, affirmed.

    Israel Packel for appellants.

    Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kirkpatrick and Richard A. Solomon for the United States.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Points 1 and 3, Northern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 356 U.S. 1 ; International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392 . Points 2 and 6, United States v. W. T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 633 . Point 4, Schine Theatres v. United States, 334 U.S. 110, 119 .


    LOUISIANA v. WALKER, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=365&invol=567">365 U.S. 567 </a> (1961) 365 U.S. 567 (1961) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    LOUISIANA v. WALKER, 365 U.S. 567 (1961)

    365 U.S. 567

    LOUISIANA EX REL. ALLEN v. WALKER, WARDEN.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
    No. 655, Misc.
    Decided March 20, 1961.

    Appeal dismissed because notice thereof was not filed within statutory period.

    Jack N. Rogers and Robert H. Reiter for appellant.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the notice thereof was not filed within the time provided by law. [365 U.S. 567, 568]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw