• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/364/627.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 627 (1961)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 627 (1961)

    364 U.S. 627

    DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
    No. 503.
    Decided January 9, 1961.

    183 F. Supp. 785, affirmed.

    Thomas F. Kilroy for appellant.

    Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


    OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=364&invol=627">364 U.S. 627 </a> (1961) 364 U.S. 627 (1961) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART, 364 U.S. 627 (1961)

    364 U.S. 627

    OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT, INC., v. STEWART ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
    No. 521.
    Decided January 9, 1961.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 223 Ore. 314, 353 P.2d 541.

    Ferris F. Boothe for appellant.

    Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Alfred B. Thomas and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [364 U.S. 627, 628]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw