• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/364/445.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    KING v. ELLIS, 364 U.S. 445 (1960)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    KING v. ELLIS, 364 U.S. 445 (1960)

    364 U.S. 445

    KING v. ELLIS, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 4, Misc.
    Decided November 21, 1960.

    Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

    Petitioner pro se.

    Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and Leon F. Pesek and Linward Shivers, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for a full hearing. Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674 .


    STATHAM v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=364&invol=445">364 U.S. 445 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 445 (1960) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    STATHAM v. CALIFORNIA, 364 U.S. 445 (1960)

    364 U.S. 445

    STATHAM v. CALIFORNIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
    DISTRICT. No. 239, Misc.
    Decided November 21, 1960.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 176 Cal. App. 2d 806, 1 Cal. Rptr. 767.

    Carl Q. Christol for petitioner.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [364 U.S. 445, 446]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw