• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/364/444.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    FORD MOTOR CO. v. PACE, 364 U.S. 444 (1960)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    FORD MOTOR CO. v. PACE, 364 U.S. 444 (1960)

    364 U.S. 444

    FORD MOTOR CO. v. PACE ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
    No. 431.
    Decided November 21, 1960.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

    Reported below: 206 Tenn. 559, 335 S. W. 2d 360.

    William T. Gossett, L. Homer Surbeck and Cecil Sims for appellant.

    K. Harland Dodson, Jr. for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.


    DART DRUG CORP. OF MARYLAND v. GADOL, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=364&invol=444">364 U.S. 444 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 444 (1960) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    DART DRUG CORP. OF MARYLAND v. GADOL, 364 U.S. 444 (1960)

    364 U.S. 444

    DART DRUG CORP. OF MARYLAND ET AL. v. GADOL ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS
    FOUR CORNERS PHARMACY.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 435.
    Decided November 21, 1960.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 222 Md. 372, 161 A. 2d 122.

    Milton M. Gottesman for appellants.

    Joseph S. Kaufman and Stedman Prescott, Jr. for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [364 U.S. 444, 445]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw