• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/362/457.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    CERMINARO v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTH. OF PITTSBURGH, 362 U.S. 457 (1960)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    CERMINARO v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTH. OF PITTSBURGH, 362 U.S. 457 (1960)

    362 U.S. 457

    CERMINARO v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PITTSBURGH ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
    PENNSYLVANIA. No. 654, Misc.
    Decided April 25, 1960.

    Appeal dismissed.

    Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___.

    Louis C. Glasso for appellant.

    Theodore L. Hazlett, Jr. and David Stahl for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed.


    CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. v. CITY OF EUCLID, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=362&invol=457">362 U.S. 457 </a> (1960) 362 U.S. 457 (1960) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. v. CITY OF EUCLID, 362 U.S. 457 (1960)

    362 U.S. 457

    CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. v. CITY OF EUCLID, OHIO, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
    No. 740.
    Decided April 25, 1960.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 170 Ohio St. 45, 162 N. E. 2d 125.

    John Lansdale for appellant.

    Paul H. Torbet and John F. Ray, Jr. for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [362 U.S. 457, 458]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw