• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/355/40.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 40 (1957)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 40 (1957)

    355 U.S. 40

    WOMETCO TELEVISION & THEATRE CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
    NEW YORK. No. 438.
    Decided November 12, 1957.

    Judgment affirmed.

    Monroe E. Stein and Richard F. Wolfson for appellant.

    Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Charles H. Weston for the United States, and Albert R. Connelly for the Miami Beach Theatre Corporation, appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


    SWIFT v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=355&invol=40">355 U.S. 40 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 40 (1957) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SWIFT v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, 355 U.S. 40 (1957)

    355 U.S. 40

    SWIFT ET AL., TRUSTEES OF THE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, BETHEL
    UNIT, v. BOROUGH OF BETHEL, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 437.
    Decided November 12, 1957.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 183 Pa. Super. 219, 130 A. 2d 240.

    Hayden C. Covington for appellants.

    Arthur W. Henderson for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [355 U.S. 40, 41]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw