• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/219/209.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    LOUISVILLE & N R. CO. v. SCOTT, 219 U.S. 209 (1911)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    LOUISVILLE & N R. CO. v. SCOTT, 219 U.S. 209 (1911)

    219 U.S. 209

    N. P. SCOTT.
    No. 286.

    Supreme Court of the United States
    Argued October 19, 20, 1910

    January 3, 1911

    Messrs. Charles H. Moorman, Joseph R. Lamar, Benjamin D. Warfield, and Henry L. Stone for plaintiff in error.

    Assistant to the Attorney General Kenyon as amicus curioe.

    No counsel for defendant in error.

    Mr. Justice Lurton delivered the opinion of the court:

    This case was heard with No. 215, Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Riverside Mills, just decided. [ 219 U.S. 186 , 55 L. ed. --, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 164.] Like that case it presents only the question of the constitutionality of the Carmack amendment of the act to regulate commerce.

    The facts are not substantially different, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals of the Commonwealth of Kentucky is affirmed upon the authority of that case.


    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw