No. 03-252
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
2003 MT 339N
STATE OF MONTANA,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ROBERT G. SCHLEINING,
a/k/a GLENNROBERT SCHLEINING,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Ninth Judicial District,
In and For the County of Toole, Cause No. DC 2000-020,
Honorable Marc G. Buyske, Presiding Judge
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For Appellant:
Robert G. Schleining, Pro Se, Shelby, Montana
For Respondent:
Honorable Mike McGrath, Attorney General; C. Mark Fowler,
Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana
Merle Raph, County Attorney, Shelby, Montana
Submitted on Briefs: October 30, 2003
Decided: December 11, 2003
Filed:
__________________________________________
Clerk
2
Justice Jim Rice delivered the Opinion of the Court.
Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 1996 Internal
Operating Rules, the following decision shall not be cited as precedent. It shall be filed as
a public document with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and shall be reported by case title,
Supreme Court cause number and result to the State Reporter Publishing Company and to
West Group in the quarterly table of noncitable cases issued by this Court.
¶ 2Robert G. Schleining (Schleining) appeals from the order entered by the District Court
denying his motion for credit toward his sentence for time served prior to his conviction. We
affirm.
¶ 3While imprisoned at the Crossroads Correctional Center in Shelby, Toole County,
Montana, on felony offenses arising out of Yellowstone County, Schleining was charged in
Toole County with conspiracy, a felony, in regard to his involvement in a scheme to smuggle
drug s into the correctional facility, and an arrest warrant was served upon him on September
1, 2000. Schleining pled guilty and was sentenced on February 8, 2001. Thereafter, he
m oved the District Court to credit this sentence for the time he had served in prison while
awaiting disposition of the Toole County charge. The District Court denied the motion on
January 2, 2003, concluding that this Court’s decision in State v. Kime , 2002 MT 38, 308
Mont. 341, 43 P.3d 290, was controlling and required denial of the motion. Following
S chleining’s receipt of a copy of the court’s order on March 25, 2003, he filed an appeal on
April 1, 2003.
¶ 4Schleining argues that he is entitled to pre-conviction credit toward his Toole County
sentence for the tim e he served at the Crossroads facility pursuant to § 46-18-403(1), MCA,
3
which addresses credit for tim e served prior to conviction. We review a district court’s
sentence for legality. State v. Horton , 2001 MT 100, ¶ 17, 305 Mont. 242, ¶ 17, 25 P.3d
886, ¶ 17. Our standard of review of the legality of a sentence is whether the district court
abused its discretion. Horton , ¶ 17.
¶ 5It is appropriate to decide this case pursuant to our Order of February 11, 2003,
am ending Section 1.3 of our 1996 Internal Operating Rules and providing for memorandum
opinions. It is manifest on the face of the briefs and the record before us that the appeal is
without merit because the legal issues are clearly controlled by settled Montana law, namely
State v. Kime , which addressed proper application of § 46-18-403(1), MCA, and which the
District Court correctly interpreted herein. There was clearly no abuse of discretion by the
District Court.
¶6We affirm.
/S/ JIM RICE
We concur:
/S/ KARLA M. GRAY
/S/ JAMES C. NELSON
/S/ JIM REGNIER
/S/ PATRICIA COTTER