Alabama Supreme Court Opinions Jul 2000

July 28 2000 Ex parte Campbell, 1981105.htm
July 28 2000 Ex parte Burton, 1981604.htm
July 28 2000 Prudential BallardRealty Co. v. Weatherly, 1981671r.htm
July 28 2000 Morgan v. DisciplinaryBd. of the Ala. State Bar, 1981705.htm
July 28 2000 Ex parte Cove Properties,Inc., 1981893.htm
July 28 2000 Ex parte Lucas, 1990112.htm
July 28 2000 Ex parte CTB, Inc., 1990119.htm
July 28 2000 Ex parte James, 1990550.htm
July 28 2000 Ex parte Brock &Blevins, Inc., 1990592.htm
July 28 2000 Ex parte Flint Constr.Co., 1990877.htm
July 28 2000 Ex parte Ellison, 1991079.htm
July 28 2000 Ex parte Tolin, 1991235.htm
July 21 2000 SouthTrust Bank,Nat'l Ass'n v. Williams, 1980706.htm
July 21 2000 Ex parte Burgess, 1980810r.htm
July 21 2000 Ex parte Butts, 1981166r.htm
July 21 2000 Ex parte City ofGadsden, 1981366.htm
July 21 2000 Elmore County Comm'nv. Smith, 1981750r.htm
July 21 2000 Ex parte Bradford, 1982169.htm
July 21 2000 Ex parte Elliott, 1982263.htm
July 21 2000 City of Birminghamv. Business Realty Inv. Co., 1990146.htm
July 21 2000 Ex parte E.D., 1990167.htm
July 21 2000 Ex parte DiversicareCorp., 1990261.htm
July 21 2000 Ex parte State ofAlabama Re: Radford v. State 1990342.htm
July 21 2000 Southern United FireIns. Co. v. Pierce, 1990443.htm
July 21 2000 Southern United FireIns. Co. v. Howard, arbitration; whetherthe arbitration clause is void because it allegedly lacks the minimal guaranteesneeded to fulfill the remedial purposes of Alabama law; whether the nonsignatorydefendants are entitled to enforce the arbitration provision under thedoctrine of equitable estoppel; whether the plaintiff assented to the arbitrationagreement in the insurance policy; whether the arbitration provision inthe policy is unenforceable as unconscionable; whether the arbitrationprovision is unenforceable because it does not specify the rules governingthe arbitration proceeding does not specify the arbitrators' fees andother costs associated with the arbitration proceeding does not specifywhich party is responsible for paying costs other than the arbitrators'fees does not specify the substantive law that governs the arbitrators'decision does not provide for the qualifications of the arbitrators; limitsthe parties' discovery rights does not provide for the making of a recordof the arbitration proceedings does not require the arbitrators to makeany findings supporting their decision and does not provide for any reviewor enforcement of the arbitrators' decision; whether the McCarran-FergusonAct rendering the arbitration provision unenforceable 1990482.htm
July 21 2000 American Termite& Pest Control, Inc. v. Riley, 1990490.htm
July 21 2000 Walker Regional MedicalCtr., Inc. v. McDonald, 1990554.htm
July 21 2000 Ex parte Hampton, 1990577.htm
July 21 2000 Ex parte Lyon Fin.Servs., Inc., 1990658.htm
July 21 2000 Ex parte DrummondCo., 1990711.htm
July 21 2000 Ex parte Fitkin,1990810 1990810.htm
July 21 2000 United WisconsinLife Ins. Co. v. Beaty 1990925.htm
July 14 2000 Green Tree Fin. Corp.v. Shoemaker, 1980978.htm
July 14 2000 Ex parte InvernessConstr. Co., 1981698.htm
July 14 2000 Ex parte Williams, 1990091.htm
July 14 2000 Ex parte Waples, 1990309.htm
July 14 2000 Hays Corp. v. BungeCorp., 1990375r.htm
July 14 2000 Ex parte Dan River,Inc., 1990894.htm
July 14 2000 Ex parte FarmersExchange Bank, 1990967.htm
July 7 2000 ConAgra, Inc. v.Turner, 1981614.htm
July 7 2000 Ex parte Lovejoy, 1981758.htm
July 7 2000 Ex parte Windom, 1991370.htm