• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/393/9.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    WHITNEY STORES, INC. v. SUMMERFORD, 393 U.S. 9 (1968)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    WHITNEY STORES, INC. v. SUMMERFORD, 393 U.S. 9 (1968)

    393 U.S. 9

    WHITNEY STORES, INC., ET AL. v. SUMMERFORD ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
    OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 85.
    Decided October 14, 1968.

    280 F. Supp. 406, affirmed.

    E. N. Zeigler for appellants.

    PER CURIAM.

    The judgment is affirmed.


    HORNBEAK v. HAMM, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=393&invol=9">393 U.S. 9 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 9 (1968) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    HORNBEAK v. HAMM, 393 U.S. 9 (1968)

    393 U.S. 9

    HORNBEAK v. HAMM, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FOR ALABAMA.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT
    OF ALABAMA. No. 260.
    Decided October 14, 1968.

    283 F. Supp. 549, affirmed.

    Barry Hess for appellant.

    MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston and Herbert I. Burson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

    MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWARD are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument. [393 U.S. 9, 10]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw