• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/393/316.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    BOYD v. CLARK, 393 U.S. 316 (1969)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    BOYD v. CLARK, 393 U.S. 316 (1969)

    393 U.S. 316

    BOYD ET AL. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 490.
    Decided January 13, 1969.

    287 F. Supp. 561, affirmed.

    Victor Rabinowitz and Leonard B. Boudin for appellants.

    Solicitor General Griswold for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The judgment is affirmed, Clark v. Gabriel, ante, p. 256, without reaching the jurisdictional question raised under 28 U.S.C. 1331.


    MARKHAM ADVERTISING CO., INC. v. WASHINGTON, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=393&invol=316">393 U.S. 316 </a> (1969) 393 U.S. 316 (1969) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    MARKHAM ADVERTISING CO., INC. v. WASHINGTON, 393 U.S. 316 (1969)

    393 U.S. 316

    MARKHAM ADVERTISING CO., INC., ET AL. v. WASHINGTON ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
    No. 648.
    Decided January 13, 1969.

    73 Wash. 2d 405, 439 P.2d 248, appeal dismissed.

    Alfred J. Schweppe and Thomas R. Beierle for appellants.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [393 U.S. 316, 317]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw