• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/356/43.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. v. LOEW'S INC., 356 U.S. 43 (1958)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. v. LOEW'S INC., 356 U.S. 43 (1958)

    356 U.S. 43

    COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. v. LOEW'S INC. ET AL.
    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
    No. 90.
    Argued January 29, 1958.
    Decided March 17, 1958.

    239 F.2d 532, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

    W. B. Carman argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Homer I. Mitchell, Warren M. Christopher, Loyd Wright and Dudley K. Wright.

    Herman F. Selvin argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Joseph P. Loeb.

    PER CURIAM.

    The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

    MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


    FORMAN v. APFEL, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=356&invol=43">356 U.S. 43 </a> (1958) 356 U.S. 43 (1958) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    FORMAN v. APFEL, 356 U.S. 43 (1958)

    356 U.S. 43

    FORMAN ET UX. v. APFEL, LIQUIDATING RECEIVER, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT.
    No. 726.
    Decided March 17, 1958.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 390 Pa. 161, 134 A. 2d 662.

    Thomson F. Edwards for appellants.

    A. D. Caesar and Nathan I. Miller for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [356 U.S. 43, 44]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw