Could not find header file for oye

 

  • View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/389/573.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    I. M. AMUSEMENT CORP. v. OHIO, 389 U.S. 573 (1968)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    I. M. AMUSEMENT CORP. v. OHIO, 389 U.S. 573 (1968)

    389 U.S. 573

    I. M. AMUSEMENT CORP. v. OHIO.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
    No. 260.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

    Reversed.

    Allen Brown for appellant.

    Melvin G. Rueger and Calvin W. Prem for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

    THE CHIEF JUSTICE concurs on the ground that evidence of contemporary community standards was excluded at trial.

    MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 .


    BAXTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?friend=oye&court=us&vol=389&invol=573">389 U.S. 573 </a> (1968) 389 U.S. 573 (1968) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    BAXTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, 389 U.S. 573 (1968)

    389 U.S. 573

    BAXTER ET AL. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
    No. 858.
    Decided January 15, 1968.

    426 Pa. 240, 231 A. 2d 151, appeal dismissed.

    Jacob J. Kilimnik for appellants.

    Frank J. Pfizenmayer and Levy Anderson for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [389 U.S. 573, 574]  

    FindLaw Career Center

    Ads by FindLaw