• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/385/450.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    NAVE v. CITY OF SEATTLE, 385 U.S. 450 (1967)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    NAVE v. CITY OF SEATTLE, 385 U.S. 450 (1967)

    385 U.S. 450

    NAVE v. CITY OF SEATTLE.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
    No. 767.
    Decided January 9, 1967.

    68 Wash. 2d 72, 415 P.2d 93, appeal dismissed.

    Footnotes

    [ Footnote ] ERRATA: "72" in "68 Wash. 2d 72" should be "721".

    Appellant pro se.

    A. L. Newbould for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 450, 451]  


    KIRKPATRICK v. PREISLER, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=385&invol=450">385 U.S. 450 </a> (1967) 385 U.S. 450 (1967) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    KIRKPATRICK v. PREISLER, 385 U.S. 450 (1967)

    385 U.S. 450

    KIRKPATRICK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSOURI, ET AL. v. PREISLER ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
    MISSOURI. No. 738.
    Decided January 9, 1967.

    257 F. Supp. 953, affirmed.

    Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and J. Gordon Siddens and Thomas J. Downey, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

    Paul W. Preisler, pro se, and for other appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

    MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw