• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/383/831.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    MILLER v. VIRGINIA, 383 U.S. 831 (1966)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    MILLER v. VIRGINIA, 383 U.S. 831 (1966)

    383 U.S. 831

    MILLER v. VIRGINIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
    No. 196, Misc.
    Decided April 4, 1966.

    Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    Appellant pro se.

    Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

    MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that in treating the papers as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted.


    DRUM v. SEAWELL, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=383&invol=831">383 U.S. 831 </a> (1966) 383 U.S. 831 (1966) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    DRUM v. SEAWELL, 383 U.S. 831 (1966)

    383 U.S. 831

    DRUM ET AL. v. SEAWELL, CHAIRMAN OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE
    BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1128.
    Decided April 4, 1966.

    249 F. Supp. 877, affirmed.

    Louis Rabil and Robinson O. Everett for appellants.

    T. Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General, and Thomas L. Young for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to advance and expedite consideration is granted. The judgment is affirmed. [383 U.S. 831, 832]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw