• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/361/232.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    STUART v. WILSON, 361 U.S. 232 (1960)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    STUART v. WILSON, 361 U.S. 232 (1960)

    361 U.S. 232

    STUART ET AL. v. WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
    TEXAS. No. 495.
    Decided January 11, 1960.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.

    Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and John Wildenthal, Jr. and Tom I. McFarling, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


    LEWIS v. MOORE, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=361&invol=232">361 U.S. 232 </a> (1960) 361 U.S. 232 (1960) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    LEWIS v. MOORE, 361 U.S. 232 (1960)

    361 U.S. 232

    LEWIS v. MOORE ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
    No. 540.
    Decided January 11, 1960.

    Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    Reported below: 250 N.C. 77, 108 S. E. 2d 26.

    Herman L. Taylor and Samuel S. Mitchell for appellant.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [361 U.S. 232, 233]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw