• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/446/1301.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    HANRAHAN v. HAMPTON , 446 U.S. 1301 (1980)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    HANRAHAN v. HAMPTON , 446 U.S. 1301 (1980)

    446 U.S. 1301

    Edward V. HANRAHAN et al.
    Iberia HAMPTON et al.

    Marlin JOHNSON et al.
    Iberia HAMPTON et al
    No. 79-912
    No. 79-914

    Supreme Court of the United States

    April 30, 1980

    On Motion to recuse.

    Mr. Justice REHNQUIST.

    Plaintiffs-respondents and their counsel in these cases have moved that I "be recused from the proceedings in this case" for the reasons stated in their 14-page motion and their five Appendices filed with the Clerk of this Court on April 3, 1980. The motion is opposed by the state- defendant petitioners in the action. Since generally the Court as an institution leaves such motions, even though they be addressed to it, to the decision of the individual Justices to whom they refer, see Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. v. Mine Workers, 325 U.S. 897 (1945) (denial of petition for rehearing) (Jackson, J., concurring), I shall treat the motion as addressed to me individually. I have considered the motion, the Appendices, the response of the state defendants, 28 U.S.C. 455 (1976 ed. and Supp. II), and the current American Bar Association Code of Judicial Conduct, and the motion is accordingly

    Denied.[ Hanrahan v. Hampton 446 U.S. 1301 (1980) ]

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw