• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/444/908.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    LARSEN v. ILLINOIS , 444 U.S. 908 (1979)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    LARSEN v. ILLINOIS , 444 U.S. 908 (1979)

    444 U.S. 908

    Raymond Scott LARSEN v. State of ILLINOIS
    No. 78-6603

    Supreme Court of the United States

    October 9, 1979

    On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois.

    The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

    Mr. Justice WHITE, with whom Mr. Justice BRENNAN joins, dissenting.

    In United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967), this Court held that a post-indictment lineup is a critical prosecutive stage in which an accused is entitled to have counsel present under the Sixth Amendment. In reliance on Wade the highest court of the State of New York has held that a pretrial psychiatric examination is also a critical stage in which the accused has a right to have defense counsel present. Lee v. County Court, 27 N.Y.2d 432, 318 N.Y.S.2d 705, 267 N.E.2d 452, cert. denied, 404 U.S. 823 (1971). Accord, State v. Corbin, 15 Or.App. 536, 516 P.2d 1314 (1973); State v. Anderson, 8 Wash.App. 782, 509 P.2d 80 (1973).

    In the instant case, however, the Supreme Court of Illinois has refused to extend Wade 's Sixth Amendment analysis to pretrial psychiatric examinations and thus has aligned itself with every Federal Court of Appeals that has decided the issue, e. g., United States v. Trapnell, 495 F.2d 22 (CA2 1974); United States v. Greene, 497 F.2d 1068 (CA7 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 909 (1975), and with many other state courts, e. g., People v. Martin, 386 Mich. 407, 192 N.W. 2d 215 (1971), cert. denied, 408 U.S. 929 ( 1972); State v. Wilson, 26 Ohio App.2d 23, 268 N.E.2d 814 (1971).

    In view of the conflict among highest state courts over whether a pretrial psychiatric examination constitutes a critical prosecutive stage in which the accused is entitled to have counsel present under the Sixth Amendment, I would grant this petition and accordingly dissent from the Court's refusal to do so.[ Larsen v. Illinois 444 U.S. 908 (1979) ]

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw