• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/395/210.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN v. O'CONNELL, 395 U.S. 210 (1969)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN v. O'CONNELL, 395 U.S. 210 (1969)

    395 U.S. 210

    BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN ET AL. v. O'CONNELL ET AL.
    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
    No. 158.
    Argued January 14, 1969.
    Decided May 26, 1969. *  

    No. 158, 391 F.2d 156; No. 172, 391 F.2d 289, vacated and remanded.

    [ Footnote * ] Together with No. 172, Dirks et al. v. Birkholz et al., on certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

    Arnold B. Elkind argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners in No. 158. David Leo Uelmen argued the cause for petitioners in No. 172. With him on the briefs were David Previant, John J. Naughton, James P. Reedy, and Gerry M. Miller.

    Lee Leibik argued the cause for respondents in each case. With him on the briefs was Ruth Weyand.

    Harold A. Ross filed briefs for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers as amicus curiae urging reversal in both cases.

    Harold C. Heiss filed a brief for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen as amicus curiae urging affirmance in both cases.

    PER CURIAM.

    The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the respective district courts with instructions to dismiss the cases as moot. [395 U.S. 210, 211]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw