• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/394/321.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    IN RE GROSS, 394 U.S. 321 (1969)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    IN RE GROSS, 394 U.S. 321 (1969)

    394 U.S. 321

    IN RE GROSS.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
    No. 1035.
    Decided March 24, 1969.

    Appeal dismissed.

    Burton Marks for appellant.

    Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey, and Michael T. Sauer for the State of California.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

    MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


    FEDERAL-BRYANT MACH. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE/ILLINOIS, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=394&invol=321">394 U.S. 321 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 321 (1969) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    FEDERAL-BRYANT MACH. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE/ILLINOIS, 394 U.S. 321 (1969)

    394 U.S. 321

    FEDERAL-BRYANT MACHINERY CO. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
    No. 1069.
    Decided March 24, 1969.

    41 Ill. 2d 64, 241 N. E. 2d 857, appeal dismissed.

    Harry H. Ruskin for appellant.

    William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Francis T. Crowe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [394 U.S. 321, 322]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw