• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/393/7.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    HANOVER INSURANCE CO. v. VICTOR, 393 U.S. 7 (1968)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    HANOVER INSURANCE CO. v. VICTOR, 393 U.S. 7 (1968)

    393 U.S. 7

    HANOVER INSURANCE CO. OF NEW YORK v. VICTOR.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
    No. 50.
    Decided October 14, 1968.

    Appeal dismissed.

    Florindo M. DeRosa, Duncan C. Lee, Frank A. Celentano, and Peter J. Malloy, Jr., for appellant.

    Harriet E. Gair for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


    COHON v. KIRBY, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=393&invol=7">393 U.S. 7 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 7 (1968) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    COHON v. KIRBY, 393 U.S. 7 (1968)

    393 U.S. 7

    COHON ET AL. v.
    KIRBY, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF CALIFORNIA.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 57.
    Decided October 14, 1968.

    256 Cal. App. 2d 158, 64 Cal. Rptr. 26, appeal dismissed.

    Herbert A. Leland, March E. Leland, J. Bruce Fratis, Joseph L. Alioto, and Richard Saveri for appellants.

    Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Elizabeth Palmer and L. Stephen Porter, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [393 U.S. 7, 8]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw