• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/393/533.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    DUNCAN v. INDIANA, 393 U.S. 533 (1969)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    DUNCAN v. INDIANA, 393 U.S. 533 (1969)

    393 U.S. 533

    DUNCAN v. INDIANA.
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
    No. 110, Misc.
    Decided February 24, 1969.

    Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

    John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Richard V. Bennett, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Indiana for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, ante, p. 374.


    TRIPLETT v. FLOYD CIRCUIT COURT, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=393&invol=533">393 U.S. 533 </a> (1969) 393 U.S. 533 (1969) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    TRIPLETT v. FLOYD CIRCUIT COURT, 393 U.S. 533 (1969)

    393 U.S. 533

    TRIPLETT v. FLOYD CIRCUIT COURT ET AL.
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
    No. 57, Misc.
    Decided February 24, 1969.

    Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

    John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Richard V. Bennett, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Indiana for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, ante, p. 374. [393 U.S. 533, 534]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw