• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/392/643.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968)

    392 U.S. 643

    GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
    No. 1261.
    Decided June 17, 1968.

    21 N. Y. 2d 152, 234 N. E. 2d 194, appeal dismissed.

    Robert E. Goldman and Stephen R. Wiener for appellant.

    Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.


    RHODES v. COOK, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=392&invol=643">392 U.S. 643 </a> (1968) 392 U.S. 643 (1968) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    RHODES v. COOK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968)

    392 U.S. 643

    RHODES v. COOK.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
    No. 1283.
    Decided June 17, 1968.

    72 Wash. 2d 436, 433 P.2d 677, appeal dismissed.

    E. A. Niemeier, Frank A. Bauman, John K. Mallory, Jr., and R. Michael Duncan for appellant.

    John F. Wilson for appellee.

    Harry R. Calbom, Jr., for Pay'n Pak Stores, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellant.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents. [392 U.S. 643, 644]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw