• View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/389/427.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    ILLINOIS v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY R. CO., 389 U.S. 427 (1967)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    ILLINOIS v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY R. CO., 389 U.S. 427 (1967)

    389 U.S. 427

    ILLINOIS EX REL. MAERAS, TREASURER & EX-OFFICIO COLLECTOR OF TAXES OF
    MADISON COUNTY v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 670.
    Decided December 18, 1967.

    36 Ill. 2d 585, 224 N. E. 2d 248, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    Burton C. Bernard for appellant.

    Hugh J. Dobbs, John F. Schlafly, Louis F. Gillespie, Gordon Burroughs, Eldon Martin, Jordan Jay Hillman and Robert L. Broderick for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


    HULSHART v. MARYLAND, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=389&invol=427">389 U.S. 427 </a> (1967) 389 U.S. 427 (1967) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    HULSHART v. MARYLAND, 389 U.S. 427 (1967)

    389 U.S. 427

    HULSHART v. MARYLAND.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
    No. 708, Misc.
    Decided December 18, 1967.

    Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    James D. Nolan for appellant.

    PER CURIAM.

    The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [389 U.S. 427, 428]  

    FindLaw Career Center

      Search for Law Jobs:

        Post a Job  |  View More Jobs
    Ads by FindLaw