Could not find header file for oye

 

  • View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/385/649.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    SPROWAL v. NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 649 (1967)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SPROWAL v. NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 649 (1967)

    385 U.S. 649

    SPROWAL v. NEW YORK.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
    No. 825.
    Decided January 23, 1967.

    Appeal dismissed.

    Carl Rachlin for appellant.

    Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

    MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [385 U.S. 649, 650]  


    FEIN v. NEW YORK, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?friend=oye&court=us&vol=385&invol=649">385 U.S. 649 </a> (1967) 385 U.S. 649 (1967) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    FEIN v. NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 649 (1967)

    385 U.S. 649

    FEIN v. NEW YORK.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
    No. 793.
    Decided January 23, 1967.

    18 N. Y. 2d 162, 219 N. E. 2d 274, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

    Louis Nizer, Paul Martinson and Bennett Boskey for appellant.

    Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

    MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

    FindLaw Career Center

    Ads by FindLaw