Could not find header file for oye

 

  • View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/385/647.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 647 (1967)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 647 (1967)

    385 U.S. 647

    FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
    ALABAMA. No. 702.
    Decided January 23, 1967.

    256 F. Supp. 23, affirmed.

    John W. Cooper for appellant.

    Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.; Guy H. Postell for Akers Motor Lines, Inc., et al.; and Harold Hernly, Robert E. Joyner and Ormond Somerville for Alabama Highway Express, Inc., et al., appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


    SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?friend=oye&court=us&vol=385&invol=647">385 U.S. 647 </a> (1967) 385 U.S. 647 (1967) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 385 U.S. 647 (1967)

    385 U.S. 647

    SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
    DISTRICT. No. 797.
    Decided January 23, 1967.

    242 Cal. App. 2d 38, 51 Cal. Rptr. 197, appeal dismissed.

    Randolph Karr and Alan L. Freedman for appellant.

    Roger Arnebergh and Bourke Jones for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 647, 648]  

    FindLaw Career Center

    Ads by FindLaw