Could not find header file for oye

 

  • View enhanced case on Westlaw
  • KeyCite this case on Westlaw
  • http://laws.findlaw.com/us/385/16.html
    Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
    Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts
    SPIESEL v. ROOS, 385 U.S. 16 (1966)

    U.S. Supreme Court

    SPIESEL v. ROOS, 385 U.S. 16 (1966)

    385 U.S. 16

    SPIESEL v. ROOS.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
    DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 390, Misc.
    Decided October 10, 1966.

    Appeal dismissed.

    Appellant pro se.

    Anthony L. Schiavetti for appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.


    BRADFORD v. POSTEL, <a href="/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?friend=oye&court=us&vol=385&invol=16">385 U.S. 16 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 16 (1966) ">

    U.S. Supreme Court

    BRADFORD v. POSTEL, 385 U.S. 16 (1966)

    385 U.S. 16

    BRADFORD v. POSTEL, JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF
    NEW YORK, ET AL.
    APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 402, Misc.
    Decided October 10, 1966.

    Appeal dismissed.

    Appellant pro se.

    Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 16, 17]  

    FindLaw Career Center

    Ads by FindLaw